SSH

Although I haven't written anything here about SSH before I have written e-mail to friends about the usefulness of this great Unix command line utility. Basically SSH stands for Secure SHell. It differs from your normal shell in that it uses encryption. Now while in and of itself encrypted communications is a good thing, the thing that has made SSH so fantastic is it's ability to tunnel TCP/IP ports over the SSH connection. What does that mean? Well I have access to my work computer via Citrix. From that machine, through a cygwin initiated SSH session back to my home computer I can tunnel traffic to various services around the network. Like what you ask? How about Oracle, SQL Server, Tomcat, IMAP Mail, CVS, etc. anything with a TCP/IP port.

Now finally I'd like to point out that you can do all this with Mac OS X out of the box by simply clicking a checkbox. But you can do a few more things to make things more secure. One of those things is to use public-key based encryption which relies on not just a password but a encrypted public key as well (i.e., something you have and something you know). Checkout this series of articles for more information. They're Mac-centric but the content is fairly generic.

Scripting

One of the Pragmatic Programmers' rules is

Don't Use Manual Procedures.

A shell script or batch file will execute the same instructions, in the same order, time after time.

The most common way I use scripting is to use Ant to create build scripts for my Java projects. Any IDE will do a lot of the things an Ant script typically does, but an Ant script is far more portable and can be scheduled to execute without a GUI (e.g., automated nightly builds).

After using Ant, I looked at languages like Ruby and Groovy. In the beginning I was mostly interested in them from a bit of an acedemic perspective (i.e., dynamic languages vs strongly typed languages) but I've also used them for automating the occasional non-visual tasks.

Lately I've come to realize that there are also plenty of tasks that could benefit from scripting GUI applications. Afterall there is plenty of functionality in GUI apps that I may want to leverage in a routine way. Enter Applescript. Somewhat surprisingly, Mac OS X's user interface and most Mac applications are pervasively scriptable. In fact just drop into XCode to build a native Mac OS X Cocoa application and your application will be Applescriptable out of the box. You can call command line scripts from Applescripts and you can call Applescripts from command line scripts. The best of both worlds.

Applescript first shipped with Mac System 7.5 in 1994. Having done some HyperCard development back in University in the late 80's I can say that Applescript seems to share a syntactical heritage with Hypertalk. For you non-Apple folks that means that Applescript attempts to be English like in its syntax in an effort to improve readability. So for example a simple script to get the Mac to move a file around might look like this:

move file "Bob" of startup disk to folder "Joe" of startup disk

I'm just starting to get into Applescript and while it's unfortunately one of those technologies that's platform dependent, I figure I should probably get somewhat comfortable with it since it's everywhere in my current OS of choice. I'll write up another entry if I discover anything particularly interesting.

[Update] Here's an article espousing the goodness of Scripting/Dynamic Languages.

Eclipse Icons

I was building a web application yesterday and decided I needed some icons to replace some buttons on one of the pages. So I started googling without much success. Although I could find the odd icon or two that would work, they were different sizes, had different colour palettes etc. They just didn't come across as being part of a coherent design.

Then I was looking at Eclipse thinking I want something like that. After a little investigation I discovered where Eclipse stores its icons. Take a look in any of the plugin subdirectories that have "ui" in their names and you'll frequently find icons in a web-friendly GIF format ready for pillaging. (e.g., [ECLIPSE_HOME]/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.ui_3.0.1/icons/full/etool16). With some of the basic icons and some of the overlay images (e.g., [ECLIPSE_HOME]/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.ui_3.0.1/icons/full/ovr16) and a little bit of photoshopping you can create some nice consistent icons for your web application.

Writing "Software"

I think part of being a good father is helping your kids understand what you do for a living. Well I write software but despite my best efforts to explain that to my six year old son he didn't quite get it. A couple of weeks ago he said something like "I can't believe someone pays Daddy for writing software". Of course my mother in law chimed in with "I can't believe it either". Nice. So I let that one go.

But yesterday, he said something like "I don't think I'd like writing software all day. I think I'd get bored." Then at supper I was trying to explain that it's not so bad and that I try to learn something new everyday to make it interesting. And he said "Well I guess you'd learn how to spell 'software'".... Wait a sec.... He thought I was writing the word "software" over and over again, like I was in some kind of permanent high school detention. LOL. From his perspective that's what writing is so it made sense (sorta). Well now I 'll have to try and sit him down and show him what I really meant. I don't think my mother-in-law would sit still for it. I'll save that conversation for another day.

Internet Explorer Sucks

I'm trying to put together a little HTML page with some Javascript to hopefully give my users a slightly better experience and I am brutally reminded why I hate using Javascript and the HTML-DOM, it just doesn't work.

Okay it works, but it only works in Firefox right now. Following good development practices I started with the browser that best supports the standards and that's Firefox. After messing around for a couple hours and getting a half-assed simulation of a popup menu, I tried it in Microsoft's crappy Internet Explorer to discover it does nothing. I don't know why yet, but I'd wager it has something to do with IE's lack of standards support. I'm no Javascript guru so this is frustrating enough already but to have IE flip me the middle finger is just infuriating. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!! IE SUCKS!

Tapestry and Eclipse

So first Tapestry... It's an alternative Java web application framework that is now hosted on the Jakarta Apache website. I don't know if I'm reading anything into the fact that it's an Apache project right beside Struts. It just surprised me a bit.

It's certainly a lot different than Struts and maybe that's not a bad thing. I haven't seriously gotten into it yet but one of the things I like is that you don't replace HTML tags with some proprietary tags (unlike ASP, JSP, PHP, etc.). That means that you can use whatever HTML editor you want, including WYSIWYG editors. A lot of Java people I know dismiss WYSIWYG editors but I actually like them. Anything that allows me to design (in the graphical sense) without writing code can't be all bad. So far all I've done is the requisite "Hello World", but so far so good. BTW, the next version of Tapestry includes HiveMind, one of those Dependency Injection frameworks everyone loves.

As for Eclipse I borrowed a book from the library this weekend called Contributing to Eclipse: Principles, Patterns, and Plug-Ins. One of the interesting things is that the authors are Kent Beck and Erich Gamma. Yes that Kent Beck and Erich Gamma! Big names in the geeky programmer realm. The book starts off with some background of Eclipse. When you use the Java IDE project within Eclipse it's so easy to forget that it was intended as a programming language neutral environment and that everything in Eclipse is a plug-in. Everything! Very cool. I already have some ideas for plug-ins but we'll see how the rest of the book goes.

Owly About RSS

If you're not using a NewsFeed Reader to read this blog then you should get yourself over to SourceForge.net and download yourself a copy of RSSOwl. It's Java based, but before you go off bitching and moaning about a crappy Java user interface you should know that it uses the Eclipse.org's Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) which means a native UI that is responsive and good looking too.

iPod bling bling

I found an iPod shuffle at Best Buy last Friday. I guess their online inventory numbers are pretty accurate afterall. So I immediately cancelled my online order with the Apple store and set about trying to make it work with my Windows XP computer at work (during lunch naturally). Well I couldn't for the life of me make it work. And it wasn't just the iPod either because a friend of mine's USB flash drive didn't work either. I don't know if it was some conflict with another Windows service or if the machine was explicitly configured not to work with these devices but all I got was flashing amber lights.

After a disappointing first crack at it, I was delighted to see it work flawlessly with my PowerMac at home. Within a minute I was copying songs from iTunes to my iPod. Then I became Mr. Antisocial for the evening as I tried out my new toy. I've never messed around with any other MP3 player in the past. Perhaps if I'd used an iPod with the clickwheel and screen I'd be dissatisified with the simple interface of the shuffle, but I think Apple has a good design here. It's idiot proof. Turn it on, press play, mess with volume, skip songs and that's it. If you want to listen to music then it doesn't get much easier than this. I rather like the shuffle mode too. I have an eclectic music collection so going from Eminem to Guns 'N' Roses to the Beatles is actually pretty cool with me.

Now the only problem I have with this thing (other than connecting it to Windows XP) is how to carry it around. I tried the lanyard and although wearing it like this was no big deal (the shuffle is itty bitty and weighs next to nothing), I didn't like all the cords once I attached the headphones. It just felt messy. So then if I don't wear it around my neck where do I put it? Well I'm trying various pockets but I'm a bit afraid of snapping it in two. They need to come up some kind of clip or a combined lanyard/headphone. I dunno.. but something needs to be done.

Finally, the one-two punch of the iPod shuffle and iTunes shows just why Apple products fit people so well. I've used Macs for a number of years and I've heard Apple say that their ability to control hardware and software ("the entire widget") is one of their biggest competitive advantages. But I never really understood that statement until I bought the iPod shuffle. Apple's competitors in this space are hardware manufacturers that can only control half of the equation while Microsoft controls the other. So while MS and Bill Gates try to beat the drum of choice (choice of different hardware manufacturers using their proprietary software, Windows Media Player) I think consumers will continue to choose the vendor who gives them the best experience. Now that I've experienced a bit of this iPod phenonenon I'll hazard a guess and say that it will continue to be Apple.

Give it up for Gates

I read an ABC interview between Peter Jennings and Bill Gates last night and just loved some of the questions and answers. Bill Gates has lost none of his competitiveness and seems to want to rewrite history in his favor... I mean c'mon Bill. You didn't create the PC industry. Let's get real here. Microsoft had an important role to play, but you were just one part of it and in the beginning you were one of many. A lot of luck made you who you are today. I'm sure the boys over at Slashdot are ripping you to shreds right now. Anyway here are some of my favorite quotes:

Gates: We're responsible for the creation of the PC industry.

Jennings: But, it isn't hard for you is it to stand back and compliment somebody else?

Jennings: I've heard some people say that if they were graduating from science or technology today, they'd rather work for [Steve] Jobs than Microsoft. Why do you think that might be true?

Jennings: When I said to somebody the other day that you at Microsoft had always said we will continue to be the innovators of technology this person who was young and a techie said "Oh they've never innovators they buy other people's material, they expropriate other people's knowledge and adapt it into their business." I don't understand that completely, but is there some truth in that?

Gates: Well the biggest thing we did was we invented the field.

Video Editing

All my video projects are strictly amateur, home video, garden variety, family stuff so my needs aren't great. I used the software that shipped with my Mac (iMovie) for quite a while. It's pretty good and worked remarkably well even on my old G3 iMac. But I started to run into the limits of the tool and decided I needed more control and flexibility. A couple of years ago I upgraded to Final Cut Express (FCE). Now I have to tell you that for the inexperienced video editor FCE is like stepping into a race car when you're used to driving a mini van. "What do you mean I have to shift gears!?"

As a result my ramp-up has been slow and arduous. If I spent every day for weeks at a time doing it, maybe things would have been different but when you're doing it in your spare time, things tend to take a bit longer. I bought a book and went through the tutorials, etc., but just found myself crawling instead of running. The terminology was very foreign (e.g., ripple, roll, slip, slide, keyframes, bin, canvas, viewer...) When it came time to doing a school project with my daughter last year I resorted to iMovie except for the voice over part where FCE came in. In fact, I have to admit that my video output was probably approaching zero. Sure I started lots of projects but I haven't finished very many.

So along came our trip to Maui and some new raw footage. Full of new energy I decided to tackle the project. Now I don't know when the lightbulb went on, but wow FCE rocks. Here's what I like:

• I can organize all my clips with bins (a.k.a., folders)


• Clips stay where I put them in the sequence (manual transmission instead of an automatic)


• Color correction! It's amazing what you can bring out of a dark shot.


• Mutliple sequences in one project.


• Non destructive editing. (I think iMovie supports this now too). Great when you change your mind.


• Better titling options


• Many available video and audio tracks (99 of each).


• Superimposing titles and other clips is a snap with multiple tracks.


• Real-time effects. I still have to render the odd thing or two, but this is great.


• Short cut keys everywhere. I hardly touch the mouse.


• Multiple windows. iMovie has one simple window. With FCE I can reorganize things for the task at hand.


• Much better audio management.

I don't know if my repertoire as a video editor has expanded yet with all this new found flexibility but I think I'm finally into an efficient editing mode again. I'm betting this video will be out the door before the end of the week. Then I can start looking into all the motion, animation, and compositing capabilities of the tool. And if things go well maybe I'll look into the new Final Cut Express DV.

Happy Trails To You

Trails is a project hosted on java.net that leverages Spring, Tapestry and Hibernate to generate a functional web application using just the domain objects. Some of the docs say it does no code generation... Don't know how that works or how useful this project would be in the real world but it looks cool. You should check out the demo video. He creates a simple little app in Eclipse with some help from XDoclet and Ant to create the database in MySQL (an XDoclet task creates the hibernate mappings and then a Hibernate task creates the database tables. Done that before and it works reasonably well). You need Quicktime installed to view the video.

I've taken a brief look at Spring in the past. It seems to be the dominant implemenatation of the Inversion of Control pattern. I've only heard of Tapestry. It's a Struts competitor of some sort. Everyone who uses it seems to rave about it. And Hibernate, well it just rocks! ;-)

iPod Shuffle RAID

This guy took 4 of these things, striped them and made a 3.9GB RAID Array out of them! Neat bit of hackery.

I ordered an iPod shuffle about a week ago but unfortunately Canada is a third world country to Apple and I won't see it for at least a month yet. Ugh... Still it's nice to see somebody doing something creative with them.

Update: I found an interesting article on Ars Technica that compares the performance of various flash drives on both Mac OS X and Windows. They even did the RAID trick on Mac OS X. This was in June last year. So while the above article might be the first to do it with iPod shuffles, it's been done before... In summary: reading is way faster than writing, big files are better than small files and not all drives are created equal. Be interesting to see where the iPod shuffle fits in.

My review of C#

I finally finished learning a thing or two about C#. My original intent was expanding my knowledge of the .NET world. I used Mono and was able to make my way through an entire book about C#. The book didn't delve too far into the frameworks and concentrated mostly on the language. Following are the notes I took while working my way through the book. They're written from a Java developer's perspective (with the odd smattering of Delphi and ObjC thrown in for good measure). Next I'll probably look into things like nant, nhibernaate, and nunit, the C# equivalents of tools I commonly use in the Java world...

Overall I was pretty happy with C# as a language. It's very much like Java and the comments below only reflect the things that are different. Generally, I would say C# is a legal J++ (Microsoft's slightly mutated Java that was taken off the market after Sun sued and won). I originally thought J++ was pretty good and I think the same about C#.

Namespaces and File structure

• Many namespaces in one file.


• No tie between public class names and name of file or name of namespaces (packages in Java) and the directories they live in. Simpler.


• But by convention one class or a few highly related classes are grouped in individual files, so in practice it may not be much different

Ref and Out parameters

• ref and out parameters must be marked in the method declaration and on the calling side. Good for readability.


• vars to be used as a ref param must be assigned before calling method.

Misc

• Main is the name of the entry point method (one per file). Note the capital M. C# uses PascalCase vs camelCase for most names. This is a bit unusual for Java developers but makes sense once you realize Anders Hejlsberg, the primary designer of C# and .NET, was the chief architect of Delphi at Borland which used Object Pascal.


• string is an intrisic type in C# (see more about structs later)


• Parameter substitution in Console.WriteLine() is useful. There is also an ability to format the parameters (e.g., Console.WriteLine( "Sum of 1,2,3 is {0:N0}.", Sum(1,2,3));) Presumably there'd be a way to generate stings using this formatting functionality. I haven't run into it yet.


• "public sealed class Plane:Flyer" sealed stops any subclasses like final in Java


• Use colon (:) for subclassing instead of extends


• Use colon (:) for implementing an interface instead of implements


• Visibility identifiers are nearly the same, public, protected, private, internal. Internal is like package scope in Java. Default is private in C# as opposed to protected in Java when it isn't explicitly defined.


• Exception handling is the same as Java except there are no checked exceptions in C#


• Use "is" instead of "instanceof"


• Interfaces are available in C#, like the IComparable with the int CompareTo( object o) method. Naming convention starts interfaces with I.

Inheritance

• In Java, every method is virtual and every method call is dispatched with a dynamic lookup. In C# you must explicitly label a method as being virtual. This has the potential to create some unexpected behavior:


1. Create a subclass and override a method using syntax like "new public void MethodName()"


2. Create a variable declared to be the supertype.


3. Assign this variable an instance of the subclass.


4. Now call the overridden method.


5. The method that gets called will actually be that of the super class and NOT the subclass.


6. If you were to typecast it to the subclass then the subclass's method gets called. Funky.


7. This doesn't happen if the super's method is declared virtual and the subclass is declared with override


• You must explicitly label an overriden method with the keywords override or new. Compiler will fail otherwise.


• Multiple constructors are supported but in order to call other constructors in the same class you have to use a strange declaration. (e.g., public Employee(): this(null, 0){...}) So why is't "this(null,0)" between the braces?


• To call a super class's constructor use something like "public Manager():base("Joe", 100){...}".

Properties

• In Java an instance variable with get and set methods is oftern referred to as a property. This idiom is often used by IDE's.


• C# defines a special syntax for properties that reduces some of the code that needs to be written. Basically it comes down to declaring a private instance variable usually named with camelCase (one of the few exceptions). Then you define a property with get and set blocks:

       private string name;
       public string Name{
           get{ return name; }
           set{ name = value; }
       }

• Now the property can be referenced just like an instance variable but behind the scenes the get and set blocks of the property is being called. I think this is a much more natural syntax than calling a method. e.g.,

person.Name = "Joe";

• Delphi had all these features too (with a different and IMHO simpler syntax). I was also suprised that I didn't see any way to simply declare indexed properties. Delphi had that one too.

Compiler

• Mono mimics the Microsoft C# command line compiler very well:


• multiple files compiled at once to create the exe "mcs /out:Test.exe Ape.cs Human.cs"


• to compile just this class and create a *.netmodule file: "mcs /target:module Ape.cs"


• to compile the exe with the *.netmodule use: "mcs /out:Test.exe Human.cs /addmodule:Ape.netmodule"

Structs

• Supposedly a struct differs from a class by the way the memory is allocated.


• Structs are created more like intrinsic variables within the class


• But they look just like classes! They can implement interfaces, their members have visibility specifiers, and they can even have methods and constructors!


• boxing and unboxing happen automatically between intrinsics and their structure brethren. e,g, int and Int32 (a struct)


• The is operator also works on structs

Delegates

• They're similar to function pointers and similar to Objective-C's selector concept (although objc's selector is more dynamic in that it's a message that isn't tied to any particular object instance).


• To use delegates:


1. declare the delegate that describes a method signature


2. instantiate a delegate that points to the method of an object instance that has a matching method (note that the method name doesn't matter just the return type and parameter types) e.g., MessageDelegate target = new MessageDelegate( myObject.PrintSomethingOut );


3. now invoke the method e.g., target("Hello, World!");


• This all avoids the mess in Swing where you must create a Listener Interface, often a Listener Adapter and then implement the interface or subclass the adater with an anonymous class. For example when wiring up gui object events to methods:

   button.addActionListener( new ActionListener(){
       public void actionPerformed( ActionEvent e ){
           //do Something like delegating to another method
       }
   });

• Five lines of code vs one plus all the overhead of a new class just to delegate a method call!! Now the Java version is closer to the typical Observer pattern and is pretty well understood and is still valid but I must admit that I like the brevity and readability of the delegate implementation.

Collections

• Collection types are LinkedList, ArrayList, Queue, Stack, Dictionary which are similar to Java's List, Map, and Set interfaces and the various implementations.


• I like names like Queue, Stack, and Dictionary


• Index access to the collection

Console.WriteLine(((Address)emp.Addresses[1]).City);

• this is actually calling the get method of the class with an index value, the index doesn't have to be an int. e.g.,

   class MyArray{
       public String this[index]{
           get{ return array[index];}
           set{array[index] = value;}
       }
   }

• C# uses the term IEnumerator. Enumerator was deprecated in Java in favor of the Iterator interface. but basically the same thing


• If the class implements IEnumerable then the foreach loop can be used instead which does the typecasting automatically on each loop iteration.

Squeaky Smalltalk

I'm nearly through the C# book I borrowed from the library (I'll blog about it soon) and this morning I was relating some of my thoughts to a co-worker about the language. But somehow we got onto the topic of Smalltalk.

She was explaining to me how weird the syntax was. We found a website that outlined the differences between Java and Smalltalk. And although things looked a little odd I recognized syntax similarities to Objective-C which didn't come as too much of a surprise and I recognized closure similarities to Ruby.

So during some free time at lunch I downloaded and tried out a free version of Smalltalk called Squeak. That environment threw me for a bit of a loop but through the help of the BankAccount tutorial I was able to write a little rinky dink class, instantiate it, interact with it and inspect it. Pretty cool.

My curiosity is piqued so I'll probably give Smalltalk a bit of a spin. Not that I expect to develop anything significant with it but since it was so instrumental in the design of other languages I figure it might be interesting...

All In The Family

What do Java, C#, Objective-C and Smalltalk all have in common? They're all in the same family!

LuntBuild

Having experienced (over a year ago now) the setup of Cruise Control (to do continuous integration of Java projects) and being thoroughly underwhelmed by the quality of that software I was quite happy to discover LuntBuild today. Bonnie, another developer at our site, set it up on one of our servers so that probably contributes to my positive experience, but setting up a scheduled build complete with the CVS extract, the call to my existing Ant script, an automatic labelling of successful builds and an e-mail to notify me of build success was a point and click affair and was done in about 20 minutes. Nice!

Steve Jobs demos NeXTSTEP 3.0

...in the early 90's. Check out this video full of goodies:

• Steve Jobs is dressed in a shirt and tie instead of his regular blue jeans and black turtleneck, but he still has his characteristic hand gestures and catch phrases (e.g., "boom, there we are", "gorgeous", "beautiful", "powerful".)


• He's pitching to enterprise customers instead of consumers.


• Lotus Improv, WordPerfect, and OpenDoc make cameos


• Connects to a Sun workstation, A Mac and a Windows box


• Steve builds a couple apps, even connecting to a Sybase database showing off NeXT's database kit, one of the first (if not the first) object relational mapping tools.


• Uses Display Postscript instead of Mac OS X's PDF rendering technology


• Mail looks a lot like today's mail.app


• Next's dock is remarkably similar to Mac OS X's dock


• This is all on a 68040! Steve mentions a port to intel 486. Amazing.


• Drag and Drop is everywhere. This is one of the things I love about the Mac.


• He shows frame for page layout and the demo is strikingly similar to Phil Schiller's demo of Apple's new word processing application Pages.

It's simply amazing to me how advanced NeXT was compared to what I was using back then. It really shows Mac OS X's heritage. Heck there are things in that demo that I don't think are even in OS X. Jeez I was doing DOS based Clipper applications and PowerBuilder 1.0 in Windows 3.0 in 1991 and NeXT was completely object oriented. Wow.

Ooey Gooey Goodness

I just came across a web site called "GUIdebook: Graphical User Unterface gallery". If you're fascinated by the history and art of the GUI from the Apple Lisa to the latest Mac OS X or Windows XP then you'll find some interesting stuff here. Highly recommended.

Back from Maui

It was only one week but we really enjoyed ourselves. We stayed at the Kaanapali Beach Hotel. It's a bit of an older hotel but the staff are fantastic. If you go with kids, be sure to sign up for the Kid's Aloha passport and do some hotel activities. The people leading the lei making, Hula dancing, etc. are great and give you the flavor of what Hawaii is all about.

Now I have some random thoughts about the trip:

• We rented a minivan (Chevy Venture) and surprisingly I actually enjoyed it. I understand why people drive these things now. I could put kids in different rows and keep them apart when they were arguing. Visibility is quite good. Folding seats give lots of room when you need it. But there were a couple of cons too. It's pretty big, hard to park and sucks gas. The controls are in odd places and where's the tachometer? I won't be running out to buy a minivan anytime soon but I may rent one again.


• Haleakala was impressive to see again. I forgot how twisty that drive was and it was colder at the top than I remember.


• Went to a Mac store while I was there and planned to buy an iPod but they were completely out of them. Good for Apple, bad for me...


• Went whale watching. The kids loved the free snacks. Oh yeah the whales were cool too. :-)


• The kukui nut lei departure ceremony by the hotel staff was cool. They sang and we each got a lei that won't immediately wilt when we get back home.


• Damn Calgary looks bad when the snow melts. No leaves, a bunch of gravel and a slushy mess. I'd prefer to see some snow covering all the brown.


• Sun is good. Sunscreen is your friend.


• Boy did I eat a lot and although I thought I was starting to gain too much weight, all I had to do was look at all the other fat tourists and I felt pretty good about myself. Maybe it has to do with the Maui resort location but I remember girls in tiny bikinis on Waikiki. These people weren't anything like that! Maybe America (me included) really are just getting fatter. ;-)


• I have a new favorite shirt from Crazy Shirts. It's a long sleeve crew neck t-shirt (not on the website) dyed with the same Blue Curacao that tints those fun island cocktails.


• I think I got some great video of the kids and the island. Looking forward to editing this one.

Apple: ALL the rumors were true

Well that's surprising! Apple rolled out everything! There's a new version of Quicktime, version 7, that will ship with Tiger. It supports much larger frame sizes at the same bitrate with the H.263 codec. There's a new version of Final Cut Express that works with HD footage and now includes Soundtrack and LiveType. iLife has new upgrades for iPhoto, iDVD, Garageband and iMovie. iMovie, like it's bigger brother Final Cut Express, also supports HD footage. Then there's the new iWork, which includes a new word processor called Pages (compatible with MS Word BTW) and an update to the presentation application Keynote (compatible with PowerPoint).

Then on the hardware front they pulled out a new low-cost Mac ($499USD) called the Mac Mini and a new Flash based iPod called the iPod Shuffle.

Now if you take into account that they lowered the price of their Cinema Displays, upgraded the Xserve and introduced Xsan last week, I have say they're definitely firing on all cylinders. It makes your head spin. Wow!